Tax Treatment of Hybrid Financial Instruments in Malaysia
- mh0683
- Sep 23, 2024
- 3 min read
Hybrid financial instruments, which combine features of both equity and debt, are becoming increasingly prevalent in today’s financial landscape. In response to this, the Inland Revenue Board of Malaysia (“IRBM”) has issued a comprehensive set of guidelines to ensure that both issuers and holders of these instruments understand the tax implications associated with their classification as either equity or debt.

Introduction to Hybrid Instruments

Hybrid instruments are financial tools that exhibit both debt and equity characteristics. Examples include preference shares, perpetual loans, bonds, and profit-participating loan notes. The classification of a hybrid instrument as either equity or debt is crucial, as it determines the tax treatment of distributions or profits from these instruments.
The IRBM guidelines emphasize that a hybrid instrument’s tax treatment should be based on its actual economic characteristics rather than its legal form. This means that issuers and holders need to analyse the substance of the instrument to determine whether it should be treated as debt or equity for tax purposes.
Key Criteria for Classification
To classify a hybrid instrument for tax purposes, several factors must be considered, including:

Source of Repayment:
An instrument is considered equity if the repayment of the principal or distributions depends on retained earnings or if, in the event of liquidation, the instrument holder has a lower priority compared to debt holders.
It is considered debt if the repayment and distributions are mandatory, irrespective of the issuer’s profits.
Right to Enforce Payment:
Debt instruments typically include provisions allowing the holder to enforce payment of both distributions and the principal. Equity instruments, on the other hand, often lack such enforceable rights.
Maturity Date:
A fixed repayment date or the inclusion of a "step-up" feature (which increases distribution rates over time) signals a debt nature.
Equity instruments usually do not have a fixed maturity date.
Issuer’s Loan Capabilities:
If the issuer can obtain a loan and make payments under arm’s length terms, it indicates the instrument is debt. If the terms are more favourable than standard loans, especially in related-party transactions, it might be classified as equity.

Voting Rights and Management Involvement:
Equity holders typically have voting rights and an interest in the company’s management. However, the absence of voting rights alone does not automatically mean the instrument is a debt instrument.
Islamic Hybrid Instruments (Sukuk)

The guidelines also address the treatment of Sukuk, an Islamic financial instrument that complies with Shariah law. Sukuk can be structured as either equity or debt, depending on the underlying contracts, such as Musyarakah or Mudharabah. These contracts generally classify the Sukuk as equity since they involve profit-sharing. However, recent innovations in Sukuk structures have resulted in some being classified as debt due to fixed returns and capital guarantees.
Tax Implications for Equity and Debt Instruments
For Equity Instruments:
Payments from equity instruments are treated as profit distributions, and dividends from Malaysian companies are generally tax-exempt for residents.
Issuers cannot claim deductions for payments related to equity instruments.

For Debt Instruments:
Payments are treated as interest, and in most cases, interest income is taxable, except for specific exemptions, such as Sukuk approved by the Securities Commission Malaysia.
Issuers can deduct payments related to debt instruments under the Income Tax Act 1967.
Conclusion
The classification of hybrid instruments has significant tax consequences for both issuers and holders. The IRBM guidelines serve as a vital resource in determining whether a hybrid instrument should be treated as equity or debt for tax purposes. As the financial landscape continues to evolve, especially with innovations in Islamic finance, understanding the tax treatment of these instruments is essential for compliance and optimal financial management.
Comentarios